商业数据不正当竞争行为的司法认定与立法改进
作者:

Judicial Determination of Unfair Competitive Behavior in Commercial Data and Legislative Improvements
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    商业数据是指经营者依法收集并控制的具有商业价值的数据。 人民法院适用《 反不正当竞争 法》 一般条款认定商业数据获取和利用行为正当与否,核心是判断经营者是否违反了商业道德,要坚持个 案原则和分场景原则细化商业道德认定。 人民法院不宜将竞争关系作为商业数据不正当竞争行为认定 的前提条件,不宜将实质性替代标准作为商业数据不正当竞争行为的认定标准。 建议完善《 反不正当竞 争法( 修订草案征求意见稿) 》 第 18 条,规定两类商业数据不正当竞争行为:一是以盗窃、胁迫、欺诈、电 子侵入等方式获取或使用其他经营者的商业数据;二是违反合理、正当的约定,获取或使用其他经营者的 商业数据。

    Abstract:

    Commercial data refers to data with commercial value that is legally collected and controlled by business operators. The People’ s Courts apply the general provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People’ s Republic of China to determine whether the acquisition and use of commercial data are legitimate. The core of this determination is whether business operators have violated business ethics. It is essential to adhere to the principles of case-by-case analysis and scenario-specific analysis to refine the recognition of business ethics. It is not appropriate for the People’ s Court to take the competitive relationship as a precondition for the determi- nation of unfair competition behavior of commercial data, and it is not appropriate for the People’ s Court to take the substantial alternative standard as the standard for the determination of unfair competition behavior of com- mercial data. It is recommended to improve Article 18 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law ( Draft Revision for Opinion) by specifying two types of unfair competition behaviors in commercial data: first, obtaining or using another operator’ s commercial data through theft, coercion, fraud, or electronic intrusion; second, obtaining or using another operator’ s commercial data in violation of reasonable and legitimate agreements.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张 哲.商业数据不正当竞争行为的司法认定与立法改进[J].重庆工商大学社会科学版,2025,42(3):150-158

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-04