面向数字政府:领导干部的数字领导力及其建构逻辑
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Towards Digital Governance: Digital Leadership of Leading Cadres and Its Construction Logic
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    作为数字政府建设的重要实践者和责任者,领导干部的数字领导力直接关乎数字政府建设的成败。数字政府建设不仅要求技术层面的效率提升,更内蕴关系层面的协同合作、服务层面的普惠包容等价值内涵。从这一范畴进行解构发现,领导干部数字领导力包括数字驾驭力、数字维护力和数字服务力三种类型,不同类型的数字领导力具有不同指向及特征。其中,数字驾驭力指向领导干部个体的数字知识储备和数字技术掌握,具有交叉性和持续性;数字维护力指向在身体离场的数字空间中领导干部与组织内外成员的联系和沟通,具有激发性和协同性;数字服务力指向数字技术赋能公共服务提供过程中的需求契合度和群众满意度,具有普惠性和包容性。从数字驾驭力到数字维护力再到数字服务力,体现了领导干部数字领导力从数字领导行为到数字战略思维再到数字治理价值的深化和转向。因此,应遵循递进式逻辑建构领导干部的数字领导力,以能力提升实现数字自主、以思维重构实现数字自觉、以价值共享实现数字自信。

    Abstract:

    As important practitioners and responsible persons in the construction of digital government, the digital leadership of leading cadres is directly related to the success or failure of digital government construction. The construction of digital government not only requires efficiency improvement at the technical level, but also contains value connotations such as collaborative cooperation at the relationship level and inclusiveness at the service level. Deconstructing from this category, it is found that the digital leadership of leading cadres includes three types: digital control, digital maintenance, and digital service. Different types of digital leadership have different directions and characteristics. Among them, digital control refers to the digital knowledge reserve and digital technology mastery of individual leading cadres, which is cross-cutting and continuous; digital maintenance refers to the connection and communication between leading cadres and members inside and outside the organization in the digital space where the body is away, which is stimulating and collaborative; digital service refers to the degree of demand fit and public satisfaction in the process of digital technology empowering public services, which is inclusive and inclusive. From digital control to digital maintenance and then to digital service, it reflects the deepening and shift of digital leadership of leading cadres from digital leadership behavior to digital strategic thinking and then to digital governance value. Therefore, the digital leadership of leading cadres should be constructed in accordance with the progressive logic, so as to achieve digital autonomy through capacity improvement, digital consciousness through thinking reconstruction, and digital confidence through value sharing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

牟 怡,范一然.面向数字政府:领导干部的数字领导力及其建构逻辑[J].重庆工商大学社会科学版,2024,41(5):135-143

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-15