伪抵抗:现代性视域下的青年怀旧行为批判——对豆瓣小组“假装活在1980—2000年”的田野考察
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Pseudo Resistance: Criticism of Youth’s Nostalgic Behavior from the Perspective of Modernity: Fieldwork on Douban Group “Pretending to Live in 1980—2000”
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    现代性与现代性危机都是必须要面对的:消费主义盛行、价值理性失落、个体无意义感不断滋生,青年主体在“假装活在1980—2000年”等类似的豆瓣小组和虚拟空间中恣意地怀旧,但这种行为和价值观的本质是抵抗吗?本研究通过参与式观察和虚拟民族志的方法开展线上田野调查,在对个体言论和社群整体予以深入考察后指出:青年主体呈现出对时空压缩的回避、对工具理性的反抗等反现代性特征,更倾向于是一种本能防御而非有意抗争,他们逃离现实而实际上又深陷于现实,这使得现代性危机无处不在。青年人的“无力感”可以理解,但一味用“怀旧”替代“求新”的价值取向值得警惕。

    Abstract:

    Both modernity and modernity crises, such as the prevalence of consumerism, loss of value rationality, and the continuous growth of individual senselessness, must be confronted. Youth subjects are freely nostalgic in virtual spaces such as one of Douban groups named “Pretending to live in 1980—2000”, but are such behaviors and values essentially a resistance to modernity? This research uses participatory observations and virtual ethnography methods to go deep into the online field. After an in-depth investigation of individual speech and the community as a whole, it points out that youth subjects show anti-modernity characteristics such as avoidance of time-space compression and resistance to instrumental rationality. Their behaviors tend to be a kind of instinctive defense rather than intentional resistance. They flee from reality but in fact are deeply trapped in reality, which makes the crisis of modernity ubiquitous. The powerless behavior of young people can be understood, but the value orientation of blindly substituting “nostalgia” for “newness” should be guarded against.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王建磊,郭锦芸.伪抵抗:现代性视域下的青年怀旧行为批判——对豆瓣小组“假装活在1980—2000年”的田野考察[J].重庆工商大学社会科学版,2023,40(5):172-180

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-09-22