个人治疗与结构变革:保守与批判理论视野下的社会工作实践*
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Individual Therapy and Structural Reform:the Social Work Practice under the Perspective of Conservative and Critical Theories
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    社会工作是科学理论指导下的助人活动,指导理论的差异显著影响了社会工作的介入视角。具体而言,保守理论倾向于将案主的问题归因于个性、心理、意志等个体层面,并运用行为矫正、心理疏导等方法实现个人治疗;批判理论则是将案主的困境归咎于社会结构,并提倡采取社会行动等宏观方法,推动结构变革。虽然二者都在社会工作领域得到了应用,但以心理学等保守理论为基础的个人治疗,始终占据专业主导地位,批判理论指导下的社会变革被边缘化。原因在于,心理学等微观理论易于操作,可以将抽象的理论观点转化为具体的治疗模式,继而容易被社会工作所吸收;同时,保守理论个体化的归因理念与西方自由主义、个人主义的主流意识形态相符,所以得到了统治阶层的支持

    Abstract:

    Social work is helping activities guided by scientific theories, so it can be significantly affected by different theories. To be more specific, conservative theories incline to attribute clients’ misery to individual level, such as personality, psychology and will, then to achieve personal treatment by behavior modification and psychological instruction. On the contrary, critical theories regard social structures as the origin of clients’ dilemma, and advocate to promote social reform by collective actions. Although both conservative and critical theories are applied to social work practice, the personal therapy guided by conservative theories(psychological theories, etc) is in dominant position, social reform led by critical theories is marginalized. The reason is, on the one hand, psychological and micro theories can easily translate abstract viewpoints into concrete therapeutic models, which can be accepted by social work effectively. On the other hand, individualistic attribution of conservative theories is consistent with western liberalism and individualism, so it can be supported by ruling class.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-18