我国群体性纠纷的形成逻辑及其多元化救济机制
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


On the Logic of Mass Conflict in China and its Diversification Relief Mechanism
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    我国群体性纠纷涉及的类型复杂多样。西方发达国家的群体性纠纷主要是在社会化大生产高速发展之后产生的消费者权益纠纷、环境污染纠纷、公害纠纷等,即涉及扩散性、分散性利益的“现代型纠纷”。而我国当前的群体性纠纷类型则包括了前现代型纠纷、现代型纠纷以及后现代型纠纷。纠纷的复杂性必然决定了我们无法照搬西方国家群体性纠纷制度的理论与实践。问题的解决路径只能是厘清群体性纠纷的生成逻辑,针对不同的纠纷类型构建多元、务实的群体性纠纷的救济体系。

    Abstract:

    In China, the mass conflict involves diverse and complex types, and there is obvious diversity in these disputes. The western developed countries group disputes mainly involves in the disputes of the consumer rights and environmental pollution and so on, which involve the interests of diffusion and dispersion of “modern type disputes”.But China’s current dispute types include modern type disputes, premodern type disputes, and postmodern type disputes. The complexity of the dispute has decided that we cannot copy the theory and practice of mass disputes system in western countries. The only path of our problem is to generate the logical clarification of mass disputes,and to construct multiple, pragmatic mass dispute relief system to solve the different types of disputes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-01-12