中共联合政府主张提出前在参加政府问题上的多方博弈
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Multiparty Game on Entering Government before the Proposal of the United  Government by Chinese Communist Party
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    国共合作实现后,中共即须面对如何与国民党政权相处,即参加政府问题。在这一问题上,中共、共产国际(苏联)、美国、国民党等四方因不同的考量而展开多方博弈。中共从扩大政治影响,促进自身发展,维系国共合作的角度讲有参加政府的需求;共产国际(苏联)为使国民党减轻对国共合作的疑虑而不愿中共参加政府;美国政府坚定支持国民党政权,对中共参加政府影响甚微;国民党则坚持一党训政体制,不愿对中共开放政权。中共未能参加政府是其抗战初期实力使然,虽有利于保持中共思想组织的独立,但却使国共合作缺乏持久性与稳定性。国民党虽然保持了其对政权的垄断,但仍然无法阻拦中共对其一党训政体制的挑战。

    Abstract:

    After the cooperation of Guomindang and Chinese Communist Party(CCP), CCP faced how to deal with Guomindang Government, i.e., entering Chinese Government. On this problem, CCP, Soviet Union and Guomindang implemented multiparty game because of different considerations. From the perspective of enlarging political influence, boosting own development, maintaining CCPGuomindang cooperation, CCP had the demand to participate in Chinese Government. In order to reduce Guomindang’s suspicion on CCPGuomindang cooperation, Soviet Union was unwilling to let CCP participate in Chinese Government. Guomindang upheld one party dictatorship and was unwilling to open the Government to CCP. CCP did not enter Chinese Government because of weak strength at the initial time of AntiJapanese War, although it was helpful to maintain the independence of CCP thought and organization, it made CCPGuomindang cooperation short of persistence and stability. Although Guomindang monopolized Chinese Government, Guomindang could not prevent the challenge to its one party dictatorship by CCP.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-06-28