基于频度与价格指标法比较的服务贸易壁垒研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Research on Trade Barriers in Services Based on the Frequency and Price Index
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    以中国入世承诺表及服务业上市公司的财务数据为基础,分别运用频度和价格指标法对中国各服务部门的贸易壁垒进行研究,并与制造业比较。结果显示,中国服务贸易对外开放广度大,但深度低,与制造业相比,服务贸易壁垒水平仍很高;服务部门间的壁垒水平差异大,除运输服务业外,传统服务业的贸易壁垒低于现代服务业,其中金融业的贸易壁垒限制最多;除教育服务外,其他部门的市场准入限制大于国民待遇限制。因此,应明确政府在服务贸易中的管理职能,完善相关法律体系。同时,逐步降低市场准入壁垒,优化产业结构,提高现代服务业竞争水平。

    Abstract:

    Based on the schedule of specific commitments to services trade of China and financial statements of the listed firms in the service sector, this paper uses the frequency and price index respectively to study trade barriers in various services and compares it with manufacturing industries. The study shows that the openness in services trade is broader but shallower, and the barriers are in higher level than that in manufacturing industries. The level of service barriers is quite different among service sectors and the level of barrier in traditional services, except the transportation, is lower than modern services among which the restrictions in financial services are most severe. The restrictions in market assess are more stringent than that is stipulated in national treatment except education service. Therefore, to clarify the functions of government and to improve the legal system is a good way to solve the problems. Meanwhile, measures should be taken to gradually reduce the market access barriers and optimize industrial structure to improve competition level of modern services.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: