“技术侦查”法律解释若干问题评析——以法律解释学为视角
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Analysis of Several Problems in Legal Explanation of “Technical Detection” ——From the Perspective of Legal Explanation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    新《刑事诉讼法》在“侦查”一章中增加了“技术侦查措施”一节,将一直处于秘密隐晦状态的“技术侦查”措施法制化,体现了保障人权与控制犯罪的平衡。然而法典相关规定过于抽象、概括,亦存在立法疏漏。为使立法得以贯彻实行,法律解释发挥着不可替代的作用。但是,从实然层面分析,有关“技术侦查措施”之法律解释条文问题丛生,就适用案件范围、批准条件与程序、种类等问题的解释要么照搬法律条文,要么逾越立法自行创设制度。通过对“技术侦查措施”之法律解释条文进行批判性分析,以点带面,揭示整个刑事诉讼法揭示存在的问题并进行反思。

    Abstract:

    A section of “technical detection” was added to “detection” chapter in new Criminal Proceedings Code to legalize “technical detection” measures which have been in obscure state, embodying the balance between human rights protection and crime control, however, there are problems in the Code such as excessive abstraction, excessive summarization and legal omission. In order to make the legislations carried out, legal explanation plays an irreplaceable role, however, the analysis from practical level reveals that there are many problems in the legal explanation of “technical detection”, such as the explanation copying the legal provisions on the problems in applicable range of the judicial cases, ratifying conditions and procedures, criminal types and so on or going out of the legislation to selfcreate institutions. Through the legal explanation and critical analysis of the legal provisions on “technical detection measures”, the reflection on the existed problems in the whole Criminal Proceedings Code from point to overall legislation is revealed and reflected.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: