法制史研究存在的问题:以《中国诉讼法溯源》为例的解读
作者:

The Defects of the Research on the History of the Legal System of China——Taking the Example of the Book of "Traces to the Source of the Chinese Procedural Law"
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    徐朝阳先生《中国诉讼法溯源》一书,被认为是诉讼制度史的经典之作。但是其在方法论的使用上存在两大问题:一是以西方的解释系统来重构我们的历史,所叙述的是徐本人型构出来的历史;二是忽视法律的表达与实践的差异,叙述的是制度中的历史。"功之不昧,过亦足惕",对于今天的中国法制史研究而言,这些问题可能同样存在。 更多还原

    Abstract:

    Mr.Xu Chaoyang’s Traces to the Source of the Chinese Procedural Law is generally regarded as a classic in the field of procedural laws in China.However,there are two problems in the methodology used.One is that the interpretive system the author used to reconstruct Chinese history is from western,what he narrated is the history which Mr.Xu wrote;the other is that the differences between representation and practice are overlooked,what he described is the history in the system.The achievement shou...

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

蒋超;.法制史研究存在的问题:以《中国诉讼法溯源》为例的解读[J].重庆工商大学社会科学版,2011,28(5):90-91

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史