瑕疵证据之新解读
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The New Application of Defective Evidence
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    非法证据排除规则一直为我国社会所关注,其所蕴含的人权保障与程序正义理念已成为刑事诉讼的基本价值体现。两个证据规则的出台明确了非法证据排除规则在我国的正式确立,但与非法证据相伴而生的还有瑕疵证据,二者在证据的基本属性上有本质的差异,对其排除与适用规则也有不同规定:非法证据一律排除,瑕疵证据则可以有条件转化适用。 更多还原

    Abstract:

    Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence which caused wide public concern and which contains human rights protection and procedure justice theory reflects basic value pursuits of the Criminal Action.The two regulations issued by the related department mark the establishment of the Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence.But the Defective Evidence is essentially different from Illegal Evidence.Exclusionary Rule of Defected Evidence and Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence have the...

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: