故意杀人罪基准刑研究--以重庆市132个案例为分析样本
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Study on the Baseline Punishment of Intentional Homicide:Taking 132 Cases in Chongqing as the Analysis Sample
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为确保量刑均衡,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院出台了《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见(试行)》等规范性文件。由于《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见(试行)》未明确基准刑内涵,基准刑裁量规则缺乏明确性、可操作性,故意杀人罪量刑存在失衡现象。为弥补此缺憾,在厘清故意杀人罪基准刑内涵基础上,以重庆市132个案例为分析样本,对司法案例中量刑结果与基准刑裁量情节相关关系进行实证分析,揭示其中规律,进而构建故意杀人罪基准刑裁量模型。

    Abstract:

    In order to ensure the balance of sentencing,the Supreme People’s Court and Procuratorate issued normative documents, such as Sentencing Guideline for Common Crimes(Trial)does not clarify the connotation of the baseline punishment, and the baseline punishment discretion rules are lack of clarity and operability, so the sentencing of intentional homicide is unbalanced. Therefore, in order to make up for this deficiency, on the basis of clarifying the connotation of benchmark punishment, this paper takes 132 cases in Chongqing as the analysis sample to empirically analyze the correlation between sentencing results and the circumstances of baseline punishment discretion, so as to construct the baseline punishment discretion model of intentional homicide.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-03-07