办理互联网金融犯罪案件的程序法律难题及破解
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Legal Problems and Solutions to the Cases of Internet Financial Crimes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    互联网金融犯罪隐蔽性强、潜伏期长,智能化程度高、专业性强,犯罪成本低、收益高、危害大,并且具有跨越时空性。这些特点给案件的管辖、电子证据的调取以及言词证据的收集带来了诸多疑难问题。确定管辖权应坚持属人性和关联性,同时考虑到案件的复杂性,可由几个主要犯罪地司法机关分段、分地办理。电子证据的调取应遵循可靠、规范、全面、监督原则,可聘请具有相应资质的鉴定机构进行真伪鉴定。言词证据的收集可以从理清犯罪团伙内部关系、健全侦查协作机制、充分利用现代科技手段以及建立网上债权登记制度入手。

    Abstract:

    The rapidly developing Internet finance breeds a series of criminal problems. Such crime has strong concealment, long incubation period, high intelligence, professionalism, low crime cost, high income, big harm, and crossing the time and space. These characteristics bring a lot of difficult problems to the jurisdiction of the case, the retrieval of electronic evidence and the collection of verbal evidence. Determining the jurisdiction should adhere to the two basic points, human nature and relevance. Simultaneously, in considering the complexity of the case, such case can be divided into several sub-jurisdictions by the judicial organs of the major criminal areas. Electronic evidence should be taken following the reliable, standardized, comprehensive, monitoring principles, and can employ the authentication body of appropriate qualification for authentication. The verbal evidence can be collected from the start to clarify the internal relations of criminal gangs, improve the coordination mechanism of investigation, make full use of modern scientific and technological means and establish online creditor registration system.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-24