传统中国调解制度正当性探讨 ——由法社会学角度切入
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Discussion on the Validity about Traditional Chinese Conciliation System ——From the Perspective of Sociology of Law
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    传统中国调解制度于当事人及官府而言存在经济性,节约了当事人的经济成本与人际成本,该制度亦与传统政府规模相适应,并满足古代官员“无讼”的价值追求。同时,传统调解制度因其调解手段的商谈性、调解依据的社会性,较之其他纠纷解决方式呈现出其特有的有效性。这种纠纷解决的经济性与有效性,作为传统中国调解制度的正当性依据,使调解制度成为中国传统社会对纠纷解决模式的理性选择。传统中国调解制度具有尊重当事人意思自治、有限的调解适用范围以及兼顾调解依据的合法性与合理性等制度优势,通过借鉴这些优势再结合当代中国现实能够完善当代调解制度。

    Abstract:

    With regard to the parties and governments, traditional Chinese conciliation system has economic efficiency, saves the economic cost and interpersonal cost of the parties, fits for the scale of traditional governments and satisfies the value pursuit of “no lawsuit” of ancient officials, meanwhile, traditional Chinese conciliation system demonstrates its unique validity, comparing with other methods to settle disputes, due to its compromising settlement of conciliation method and its socialization of conciliation basis. This kind of economic efficiency and validity to settle disputes, as the proper basis of traditional Chinese conciliation system, makes the conciliation system become the rational choice for disputes settlement mode of Chinese traditional society, as a result, contemporary conciliation system can be perfected by the systematic advantages such as limited conciliation application scope, the combination of validity and rationality of conciliation basis and so on and on the basis of China’s reality via these advantages.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: