刑事简易程序中被告人权利保障机制研究——兼评《刑诉法修正案》改革简易程序的得与失
作者:

Research on Defender Right Protection Mechanism in Criminal Summary Proceeding ——Comment on the Virtuous and Adverse Contents of Summary Proceeding Reform in Criminal 
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    2012年初,刑事诉讼法经历了全面修订,其中刑事简易程序发生了重要变革。随着此次修订将“尊重和保障人权”写入法典,引发了法律人对简易程序价值定位的再思考,公平和效率这对永恒的矛盾体在简易程序的修订下再次引发关注。在当前功利主义者追逐“繁简分流、简者愈简”的形势下,被告人权利保障这一刑事诉讼的第一要旨往往被人所忽略,在简易程序中尤甚。程序选择权、获得辩护权、合理辩解权、程序利用收益权以及及时获判权应当成为简易程序中被告人权利的最低保障范围,而《刑诉法修正案》对简易程序的改革可谓喜忧参半。

    Abstract:

    In the early 2012, Criminal Proceedings Code was overall revised, among which criminal summary proceeding had important change. With the amendment, “Respecting and Protecting Human Rights is included in the Code, which trigger rethinking by legal personnel on the position of summary proceeding value, causing redebate about fairness and efficiency, the eternal contradiction, under the amendment of the summary proceeding. Under the situation that the utilitarian pursues “separation of simplicity from complexity and that simplicity should be more simple”, the first gist of defender right protection in criminal proceeding is usually ignored, especially in summary proceeding. Proceeding selection right, the right to counsel, rational explanation right, proceeding utilization benefit right and the right to be sentenced in time should become minimum guaranteeing scope of defender rights in summary proceeding, however, the reform of Criminal Proceedings Code Amendment on summary proceeding has half virtuous contents and half adverse contents.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

顾彬.刑事简易程序中被告人权利保障机制研究——兼评《刑诉法修正案》改革简易程序的得与失[J].重庆工商大学社会科学版,2013,30(5):116-122

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史