环境法中人本主义与生态主义的对立及解决——以个案为例的分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Oppositions between Anthropocentrism and Ecologism in Environmental Law and Their Solutions——Taking an Case as an Example
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    环境法中存在着两种对立的基本立场,人本主义和生态主义。人本主义以保护人类的根本利益为中心,生态权益只能作为法律客体对待,因此非人类存在物,如动物、植物以及自然界都不能成为法律上的主体,因而不能受到法律的保护。生态主义认为人与动植物以及整个的生态系统都具有自己的内在价值,在法律上应该具有平等的主体地位,应该被平等保护。 这两种对立的立场会对个案的结果产生截然不同的影响,在环境法没有明确确立何种立场是根本立场的时候,可以通过环境法法律方法,尤其是利益衡量的方法来解决两者的对立。

    Abstract:

    There are Anthropocentrism and Ecologism, two basic opposite viewpoints in environmental law, Anthropocentrism takes the protecting of the basic interest of human beings as the center and holds that ecological benefit can only be regarded as the object of laws, thus, inhuman entities, such as animal, plant and the nature, can not be the subject of legal relationship and can not be protected by laws.However,Ecologism believes that human beings, animal, plant and all ecologic system have their intrinsic value, should have equal subject position in laws and should be equally protected. These two opposite viewpoints have sharply different influence on the results of the cases.When environment law does not determine whether Anthropocentrism or Ecologism is basic stand, we can solve the opposition between Anthropocentrism and Ecologism by legal method of environmental law, especially the method of balancing of interest of the two.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: