自诉证据制度若干问题的探讨
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


On the system of evidence of private prosecution
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    刑事证据制度是刑事诉讼制度的核心与基础,是体现司法公正的必要条件。我国《刑事诉讼法》第四十二条规定,证明案件真实情况的一切事实,都是证据,并列举了证据的七种具体表现形式,且其证据能力一般不受限制。这就导致修订后的刑事诉讼法在程序上没有很好地贯彻诉讼对抗制,给实践操作带来很多问题,在证明标准和证据规则等方面表现得尤为明显。

    Abstract:

    The system of criminal evidence is the core and basis of the system of criminal procedure, and it is the requirement of judicial justice. It is stipulated that all the facts that can prove the truth of the case are proofs and seven specific manifestations of evidence whose competency of evidence is not limited in general are enumerated in Article 42 of the criminal procedure law of China. As a result, the adversary system has not been well implemented in the procedure since the criminal procedure law was revised,which has caused many problems in practice,especially in terms of standard of proof and rules of evidence.The author plans to discuss it from the two aspects in sequence.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: