| 摘要: |
| 以Trumper-Hecht提出的语言景观三维分析模型为理据，选取合肥市卫岗、十里店、桃花园三大社区下辖的城中村为语料采集范围，通过定量与定性相结合的混合研究法，从实体维度、政治维度和体验维度对城中村语言景观的建设风貌进行三维透视。研究发现，城中村居民的语言生产活动随意性较强，缺乏地方语言政策与规划的指导；城中村当前的语言景观建设格局未能充分体现对居民主流意识形态培育的关怀；城中村内部和外部的语言生活相对独立，缺乏深度交集，不利于构建和谐融通的国际化语言环境。鉴于此，从治理语言环境、培植主流意识形态、建立三方联动合作机制三个层面提出应对方略，旨在为地方政府制定、修订或完善语言政策与规划提供依据，为其他地区治理城乡语言环境，创建和谐共荣的语言生态提供参考。 |
| 关键词: 语言景观 城中村 语言政策与规划 主流意识形态 语言生态格局 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Reflections on the Construction of Linguistic Landscape in Urban Villages: A Three dimension Perspective |
|
ZHOU Xiao-chun
|
|
School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Based on the three-dimensional analysis model of language landscape proposed by Trumper Hecht, the urban villages under the jurisdiction of the three major communities of Weigang, Shilidian, and Taoyuan in Hefei City were selected for corpus collection, a mixed research method combining quantitative and qualitative methods was utilized, and a three-dimensional perspective on the construction of language landscapes in urban villages was provided from the physical, political and experiential dimensions. The research findings are as follows: the use of language in urban villages turns out to be non-standard due to the lack of local language policies and planning; the construction of linguistic landscape in urban villages pays less attention to the cultivation of residents’ ideology; the goal of creating a harmonious and international language environment may not be easily accomplished due to the lack of communication between people from urban villages and those outside. Thus, corresponding recommendations are made from the perspectives of regulating the language environment, developing mainstream ideology, and setting up a three-party cooperative system, to provide a basis for the local government to formulate, revise, or improve its language policies and plans and provide a reference for other regions to govern the urban and rural language environments and to create a harmonious and co prosperous linguistic ecosystem. |
| Key words: linguistic landscape urban villages language policy and planning mainstream ideology ecological language environment |
