| 摘要: |
| 研究范式是特定研究问题、研究方法和研究理论等研究模型的统称，各范式之间的主要区别在于研究方法。目前民事诉讼法学界的研究范式可以归为两类：一是基于裁判者视角的规范法学研究范式，主要以法教义学和案例分析法为主要研究方法；二是基于立法者视角的社科法学研究范式，具体分为法律政治学、法律社会学、法律经济学和法律认知科学等，其中以实证研究方法为主要研究方法。这与罗马神雅努斯的两面形象正相契合。面对新时代“中国民事诉讼法学理论话语体系”的建构问题，必须在这两类研究范式的基础之上进行第三种范式的探索和尝试，即规范法学与社科法学研究方法的结合互补，唯此我国民事诉讼法学研究才能摆脱困局。 |
| 关键词: 规范法学 社科法学 法教义学 法学实证研究 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Awakening of Janus’Dual Faces: Study of the Research Paradigm of Civil Procedural Law of the People’s Republic of China |
|
WU Ru-qiao, WANG Rui
|
|
School of Law, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Research paradigm is a collective name for research models such as specific research problems, research methods, and research theories. The main difference between the paradigms lies in research methods. At present, the research paradigms in the field of civil procedural law can be divided into two categories. One is the research paradigm of the normative law based on the perspective of judges, mainly using legal dogmatics and case analysis as the research methods; the other is the research paradigm of the social sciences of law based on the perspective of legislators, which is specifically divided into legal politics, legal sociology, legal economics and legal cognitive science, and the empirical legal research is the main method. It corresponds to the image of the Roman God called Janus with two faces in opposite directions. In the new era, facing the matter of constructing the theoretical discourse system of China Civil Procedural Law Science, it is necessary to explore and try the third paradigm on the basis of these two research paradigms, that is, the combination and complementation of the research methods of normative law and social science of law. Only in this way can the research of China’s civil procedural law get rid of the dilemma. |
| Key words: normative law social sciences of law legal dogmatics legal empirical research |
