| 摘要: |
| “谁来种地”的问题始终关系着国家粮食战略安全，农地流转是解决这一问题的有效探索。但我国农地流转市场存在大量的人格化交易，这种交易形式是否会影响农户种粮积极性？利用农地转入零租金衡量人格化农地流转，探究其对粮食种植的影响，以及不同约束条件下人格化农地流转对粮食种植的影响。研究发现：人格化农地流转显著促进了转入户粮食种植的积极性，“趋粮化”效应明显，且这种“趋粮化”效应在普通农户群体中的影响更大；人格化农地流转引致的“趋粮化”效应主要原因在于转入户所面临的成本效应、锚定效应以及机械替代效应；此外，人格化农地流转引致的“趋粮化”效应还存在约束条件，转入户营利性动机和农地细碎化明显阻碍人格化农地流转的“趋粮化”效应。本研究说明在当前农地流转人格化交易特征明显的情境下，“趋粮化”效应尚能保证；但随着农地流转市场逐渐向市场化转型后，如何保障粮食安全将是一项重大课题。 |
| 关键词: 人格化农地流转 “趋粮化” 零租金 种植结构 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Will Personalized Farmland Transfer Lead to a “Tendency to Plant Grains”? |
|
LIU Wei1, ZHANG Ying-liang21,2
|
|
1. Research Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtse River, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;2.
2. Research Center for Rural Economy and Management, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
|
| Abstract: |
| The issue of “who will farm the land” is always related to the national food strategy security, and the transfer of farmland is an effective exploration to solve this problem. However, there are a lot of personalized transactions in China’s agricultural land transfer market. Does this form of transaction affect farmers’ incentive to grow grains? This paper uses the zero rent of farmland to measure the transfer of personalized farmland and explore its impact on grain cultivation, as well as the impact of the transfer of personalized farmland on grain cultivation under different constraints. The study found that the transfer of personalized farmland significantly promoted the incentive of food cultivation among the transferring households, and the “tendency to plant grains” effect was obvious, and the effect of this “tendency to plant grains” was more influential among ordinary farmers. The main reasons for the “tendency to plant grains” effect of personalized farmland transfer are the cost effect, anchoring effect and mechanical substitution effect faced by the transferring households. In addition, there are also constraints on the “tendency to plant grains” effect of personalized farmland transfer. The profit motive of the transferring households and the fragmentation of farmland can significantly hinder the “tendency to plant grains” effect of personalized farmland transfer. The purpose of this study is to show that under the current situation where the transfer of agricultural land is characterized by personalized transactions, the effect of the “tendency to plant grains” can still be guaranteed. Nevertheless, with the gradual transformation of the agricultural land transfer market into a market-oriented one, how to ensure food security will be a major issue. |
| Key words: personalized farmland transfer tendency to plant grains zero rent agricultural planting structure |
