| 摘要: |
| “权利泛化”意指一种缺乏法权基础的社会现象,兼具描述性和规范性。“强权利泛化命题”主张权利泛化是一个伪命题,不仅因为它与权利膨胀、权利滥用以及权利冲突存在语义和语用上的区别,也因为权利泛化在正式法律场合不可能存在,而在公共辩论中也不是一个普遍的现象。由权利成本以及权利乌龙引发出的权利指责无论在道德还是政治层面都更难以对权利的内在价值构成挑战。每一次权利实践都是一次关于现代人的生存和生活方式的操练,作为一种警醒的权利泛化反而提醒我们要继续尊重和捍卫权利。 |
| 关键词: 权利泛化 权利性条款 公共辩论 后果主义 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Generalization of Right Is a False Proposition |
|
WANG Rong-yu
|
|
School of Administration Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China
|
| Abstract: |
| The generalization of right is a social phenomenon which is lacking the basis of legal domain and which covers both dimensions of descriptive and normative.Strong Generalization of Right thesis holds that the generalization of right is a false proposition not only because of the sematic and pragmatic distinction between it and Right Inflation,Right Abuse and Right Conflict but also it cannot exist in a formal legal situation.so it could not be a universal phenomenon in public debate.It is difficult to challenge the inner values of rights in both moral or political area coming from the blame caused by Right Cost and Right oolong.Each practice of rights is an exercise about the survival and lifestyle of modern people,the generalization of right as an alarm reminds us to respect and defend rights. |
| Key words: the generalization of right legal clause public debate consequentialism |
