艺术的价值辨析——再论舒斯特曼通俗艺术价值观*
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Analysis of the Value in Art: Rediscussion on the Value Judgment of Popular Art of Richard Shusterman
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    舒斯特曼从实用主义哲学出发,为通俗艺术的价值进行了辩护,将通俗艺术审美价值的合法性归结于“审美快感”,力图消除理论界对不同艺术形式所采取的“高雅”“通俗”之别,尝试在身体经验的领域为通俗艺术寻得一片合法之地,并最终在经验主义哲学的基础上构建起一种“整体的艺术观”。然而当舒斯特曼集中火力批判传统艺术批评的保守、狭隘,批判其对大众文化、通俗艺术过于苛刻时,舒斯特曼却并未真正触及通俗艺术内部的审美价值辨析,自然也就无法给予“艺术”一个自洽的价值判断。为通俗艺术的价值正名,仍需回到艺术的内部来审视其价值的生成机制。

    Abstract:

    Richard Shusterman argued for the value of popular art from the perspective of pragmatic philosophy. He attributed the validity of aesthetic value of popular art to “aesthetic pleasure”, and thus strove to eliminate the theoretical division between “elegance” and “popularity” for different artistic forms. He attempted to prove the reasonable existence of popular art by physical experiences, so that he could build up an integral artistic view. However, Richard Shusterman failed to give an appropriate value judgment of art itself, because he did not touch the real artistic value in the core of popular art as he had focused on criticizing the conventional art criticism for parochialism and conservation. To prove the value of popular art, this essay takes a way to explore the formation mechanism of artistic value at the interior of the art.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-18