| 摘要: |
| 《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第十六条第二款是关于国家工作人员事后知情型受贿的规定，其中关于特定关系人与国家工作人员是否成立共犯主要存在三种观点，即不成立共犯说、成立共犯说和成立共犯待定说。后两种观点不具有可取性，不成立共犯说的结论正确但路径错误。事后知情型受贿具有不同于标准受贿的特点，其受贿的故意属推定故意，不能以推定故意为基础再行推定共犯的成立。而且，在特定关系人索取或收受他人财物的情况下，其不法即已确定而不可能再随着国家工作人员是否将财物退还或上交而发生变动。因而，在事后知情型受贿的情况下，特定关系人构成利用影响力受贿罪，国家工作人员构成受贿罪，二者不成立共犯。 |
| 关键词: 事后知情型受贿 推定故意 因果共犯论 违法的稳定性 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Negation on the Accomplice of Informed Bribery |
|
SHAO Dong-hao
|
| Abstract: |
| Article 16 (2) of the “Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Corruption and Bribery Criminal Cases” is about the provision of unrecognized bribery by state staff after the event. There are three main points concerning whether a particular relationship and a national staff member establish an accomplice. That is to say, the establishment of accomplices, the disestablishment of accomplices and the establishment of accomplices to be determined, the latter two views are not desirable, the conclusion of the establishment of accomplices is correct but the path is wrong. Post-information-type bribery has the characteristics of accepting bribes in a standard sense. The intention of accepting bribes is presumed to be deliberate, and the establishment of accomplices cannot be presumed based on presumption of deliberate intention. Moreover, in the case of a particular relationship person requesting or accepting the property of another person, the illegality has been determined and may not be changed again as the state staff refunds or turns in the property. Therefore, in the case of post-informed bribery, the specific relationship constitutes the use of influence to accept bribes, the state staff constitutes the crime of accepting bribes, and the two do not establish accomplices. |
| Key words: informed accepting bribes afterwards presumed intention causal accomplice theory illegal stability |
