| 摘要: |
| “空间转向”之后的空间叙事学成为了炙手可热的“显学”。但是，当前的空间叙事研究到了一个瓶颈阶段，原因多种。“空间转向”的这股后现代思潮有着不可推卸的责任。“空间转向”的叙事推力功不可没，但后现代历史碎片化、随意切割时间历史的粗暴式学术批评也是不足取的。所以，首先，必须纠正“空间转向”等同于空间叙事研究的偏向。其次，必须区分出“形式化空间叙事”和“内容性空间叙事”，并且分别加以历史化——“空间再转向”，以结束当前空间叙事研究的破碎化、非历史化倾向。 |
| 关键词: “空间转向” 形式化空间叙事 内容性空间叙事 历史化 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| After“Space Turn”,“How to Do” |
|
ZHAO Bin
|
| Abstract: |
| “Space narrative after space shift” has become a hot field. However, the current space narrative research comes to a bottleneck stage, there are many reasons. The post modern ideological trend of “space turn” has an inescapable responsibility. The so called “success comes from it but the failure also comes from it”. “The narrative thrust of “space turn” has the contribution, but roughly academic criticism of the history of the post modern history fragmentation and the randomly cutting time history is worthless. As a result, firstly, we must correct the deviation that the “spatial turn” is as the same as the spatial narrative study. Secondly, we must distinguish the form of spatial narrative from the content of spatial narrative, to let both of them be historical, “space and then turn”, so as to end the fragmentation and non historical tendency in the current space narrative research. |
| Key words: “spatial turn” formal narrative space content of space narrative history |
