| 摘要: |
| 在研究茶陵和前七子派关系时，近人陈田提出了很有影响的“坛坫下移郎署”说。而之前的明清人则认为两派或是前后相承，或是前正后邪。追索康海父亲墓文写作这一标志性分裂事件，从写作权利“旧例”的被颠覆和前七子派记述者的预设叙事逻辑，可见其实质是争夺世俗文章的书写权利，并影响了中晚明的文学下移大势。然面对前七子的系列“进攻”，茶陵派则多是“虚应”和“暗战”。这与前七子出于茶陵派有关，更与流派论争并不一定流于现实斗争的表现特点有关。 |
| 关键词: 文权下移 “旧例” 预设叙事逻辑 文学流派论争 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Fight for the Writing Right: on the Original Relationship between the Former Seven Giants School and Cha Ling School |
|
ZHANG Huan, FENG Xiao lu
|
| Abstract: |
| About the relationship between the former seven giants school and the Cha Ling school, Chen Tian had a deep going conclusion that the cabinet’s writing right fall into the common officials, but the scholar in the Ming and Qing Dynasties regarded that the former improved the latter, or the former was legitimism and the latter was wicked. According to the fact that the usual practice was refused and the scheduled recount logic of the former seven giants school, researching on the epitaph writing of Kang Hai’s father, it is found that the essence of this division event is fight for the writing right and finally influenced the writing tides of the middle and late Ming Dynasty. Facing the former’s violent attack, the Cha Ling School counterattacked so ambiguously that it looked like avoiding. The cause is related with the fact that the former was derived from the latter and the feature of argument between literary schools which is not necessary in the form of a real fight. |
| Key words: writing right fall down usual practice scheduled recount logic argument between literary schools |
