| 摘要: |
| 关于“合同的解除是否具有溯及力”这一问题，在我国的理论界和实务界素来存在争议，产生了“直接效力说”和“折中说”两种理论学说。合同解除的溯及力问题不仅涉及合同自身的效力，而且还牵涉不当得利、物权变动等一系列民法基本制度。本文以解释论的方法，参考德国民法上的学说，从与有关民法制度、基本原则相契合的角度，对上述两种学说进行了检讨。 |
| 关键词: 合同解除 溯及力 直接效力说 折中说 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Retroactivity of the Dissolution of a Contract |
|
LIAO Xie lin
|
| Abstract: |
| There are many controversies in the theory and practice on the question “is there retroactivity about the dissolution of a contract?” To answer this question, there exist two different theories: the theory of eclecticism and the theory of direct effect.This question relates to not only the effect of the contract, but also a series of important institutions of civil law such as unjust benefit and property right change and so on. This article uses the explaining method, refers to the theory of the German civil law, and considers the institutions and principles of the civil law, in order to evaluate the theory of eclecticism and the theory of direct effect. |
| Key words: dissolution of a contract retroactivity theory of direct effect theory of eclecticism |
