| 摘要: |
| 为了避免或减少由双宾语结构引起的理论冗余和导致的教学尴尬，本文重审双宾语结构研究中的两大焦点问题——格问题与主目结构问题，发现：双宾语结构中的直宾与间宾不能都获得宾格，从而无法成为合法的动词宾语。因此，双宾语结构不具有句法学意义上的合法性，而只存于语言表象。这一推论得到了语言事实的印证。 |
| 关键词: 双宾语结构 宾格 二分结构 合法性 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Querying the Validity of the Double Object Construction |
|
ZHAO Chun sheng
|
| Abstract: |
| In order to reduce or avoid the redundancy in theoretical researches and the awkwardness in language teaching brought about by the double object construction (DOC), this paper reexamines the case assignment and the argument structure in the DOC, and finds out the following facts: the indirect object and the direct object can not be both assigned accusative case; the DOC, in which one predicate verb takes two internal arguments as its objects, goes against the binary structure, the holographic law of language and the universe. Based on those facts, an inference, verified by the real linguistic data, can be made that the DOC is representational and makes no sense in terms of syntactic existence. |
| Key words: double object construction, accusative case, binary structure, validity |
