| 摘要: |
| 劳动生产率提高以后，商品价值量到底是反向变动（成反比）还是正向变动（成正比）近年来成为马克思主义劳动价值论的一个争论焦点。“成反比”是马克思的劳动价值理论的科学结论。而成正比学派反对这个结论必然导致推翻劳动价值理论。在这场争论中，已经有学者全面阐述和批判了成正比学派的观点，但仍然有人试图为成正比学派辩解。然而，这个辩解是不成功的，说明其“论证”的举例甚至是建立在计算误差之上的。 |
| 关键词: 劳动价值论 成正比 成反比 商品价值 劳动生产率 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Why is Labor Productivity Positively Proportioned to Commodity Value Amount Wrong——Negotiation with Wang Chaoke and Guo Fengzhi |
|
YU Bin
|
| Abstract: |
| After the raising of labor productivity, whether commodity value amount is inversely changed (inversely proportioned) or positively changed (positively proportioned) becomes a debate focus of Marxism labor value theory in recent years but the scientific conclusion of Marxism labor value theory is that it is “inversely proportioned”, however, the school who states that it is positively proportioned about this conclusion inevitably results in overthrowing the labor value theory. In this dispute, there are scholars who have overall discussed and criticized the viewpoint about that it is positively proportioned but there are still scholars who try to defend the school who states that it is positively proportioned. However, this defending is not successful, which indicates that their examples in the “proof” are even based on the deviation of calculation. |
| Key words: labor value theory be positively proportioned be inversely proportioned commodity value labor productivity |
