| 摘要: |
| 从《国朝汉学师承记》、《国朝经师经义目录》、《国朝宋学渊源记》看，江藩基本把握住了戴震的学术全貌，比较注重戴震对友朋后学的影响，当然，这两点处处都渗透着江藩的“纯汉学”眼光；江藩对戴震以“晓徵为第二人”颇有微词，这是缘于他认为戴氏之学低于钱大昕，实际上他在多处是惠戴并称的；江藩品人论学多以戴震为参照，其前辈学者及友朋论戴惠之学亦无贵己贱彼之迹象。认为吴皖分帜之观念始于江藩且其有重吴略皖之倾向，实有武断之处。 |
| 关键词: 江藩 戴震 吴皖分帜 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The opposition of Wu Wan Schools and JiangFan’s evaluation on DaiZhen |
|
CHEN An min，WANG Jiang
|
| Abstract: |
| From The Sinological Pedigree of Qing Dynasty, The Catalogue of Confucian Masters And Their Works of Qing Dynasty, The Song School Pedigree of Qing Dynasty, JiangFan almost grasps all features of DaiZhen’s learning thought, and pays great attention to DaiZhen’s influence on his friends and later students, certainly many places were seeping JiangFan’s “pure sinology view”; JiangFan is not satisfied with DaiZhen’ evaluation on Qian Daxin. “The later one is the second person”, its cause for his thinking that DaiZhen’s learning achievement is lower than Qian Daxin, in fact, his evaluation on DaiZhen is often equal to HuiDong; Furthermore, JiangFan evaluates that the others are often based on the critic of DaiZhen, the senior scholars and the friends of JiangFan are also not higher or lower than the one or the others. So it is not sensible to think that the idea of the opposition of Wu–Wan Schools is sent from Jiangfan and he is higher or lower than the one or the others. |
| Key words: JiangFan DaiZhen the opposition of Wu–Wan Schools |
