|
| 摘要: |
| 在我国的专利侵权诉讼的司法实践中,多余指定原则的适用与否日益成为关注的焦点,学者们对此众说纷纭,莫衷一是。我国的司法实践既不应简单地排除多余指定理论或者非必要技术特征理论也不能使专利权保护范围的确定变得过于灵活。就目前来讲,多余指定原则仍有待于进一步完善和发展。 |
| 关键词: 专利侵权 多余指定 非必要技术特征 权利要求书 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:D923.42 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Comments on principle superfluity establishing |
|
范艳利' target='_blank'>FAN Yan-li
|
| Abstract: |
| In the practice of patent violation litigation,the implementation of the principle of superfluity establishing becomes the focus.There are a lot of discussions on it.The judicial practice of China should not simply exclude superfluity establishing theorie |
| Key words: patent violation,superfluity establishing,dispensable technical feature,claim, |
