|
| 摘要: |
| 刘涌案引起公众大量非议的重要原因是二审判决书论证不足和公开性不够.加强判决书的说理和论证并向公众公开是树立司法权威、建立为人民服务司法和实现理论界与实务界良性互动所必要的.判决书的论证应从证据能力、证明力、证据的综合认定及法律适用几方面进行.公开判决书可通过网上公布及公共场合展示来实现. |
| 关键词: 司法 判决书 论证 公开 司法权威 刘涌案 判决书 sunshine Justice Case publication deliberation 公共场合 法律适用 综合 证据能力 证明力 良性互动 实务界 实现理论 为人民服务 加强 公开性 书论 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:D926 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Justice in sunshine:on Issues of deliberation and publication of the verdict elicited from liu Yong Case |
|
WANG Zhao-xiang ZHU Feng-xiang
|
| Abstract: |
| Liu Yong case has incurred much criticism from the public. One important reason is that the deliberation and publication in the verdict of second instance is inadequate. Strengthening the persuasiveness and deliberation of the verdict and making it access |
| Key words: justice,verdict,deliberation,publication |
