引用本文:赖鑫渝,张立欣,黄振生.多元响应线性回归模型的马氏 Mallows 模型平均方法改进(J/M/D/N,J:杂志,M:书,D:论文,N:报纸).期刊名称,2023,40(2):94-98
CHEN X. Adap tive slidingmode contr ol for discrete2ti me multi2inputmulti2 out put systems[ J ]. Aut omatica, 2006, 42(6): 4272-435
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 561次   下载 1921 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
多元响应线性回归模型的马氏 Mallows 模型平均方法改进
赖鑫渝,张立欣,黄振生
南京理工大学 理学院,南京 210094
摘要:
针对多元响应线性回归模型,提出了修改的马氏 Mallows 模型平均(MMMAc)方法。 为了更充分地利用多 元响应变量之间的相关性信息从而更好地提高预测精度,组合权重选择准则的构造同样考虑了马氏距离预测风 险,并通过构造 Wishart 分布,推导出预测损失的无偏估计作为权重的选择准则,最终得到的 MMMAc 准则相比马 氏 Mallows 模型平均(MMMA)准则增加了一个偏差矫正项,减小了对预测损失估计的偏差,因此通过最小化该准 则得到的权重估计能更接近不可得的理论最优组合权重;最后,模拟对比实验验证了 MMMAc 方法的优势: MMMAc 估计具有与 MMMA 估计同样的渐进最优性,因此两者的表现在大样本情形下没有太大差异,然而,由于修 改后的权重选择准则为预测损失的无偏估计,因此在样本量不足的情形下,MMMAc 方法的预测表现更佳。
关键词:  多元响应线性回归  模型平均方法  Mallows 准则  Wishart 分布
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Improvement of Mahalanobis Mallows Model Averaging Method for Multivariate Response Linear Regression Models
LAI Xinyu, ZHANG Lixin, HUANG Zhensheng
School of Science, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Abstract:
A corrected Mahalanobis Mallows model averaging ( MMMAc) method was proposed for the multivariate response linear regression model. In order to make full use of the correlation information among multivariate response variables and improve the prediction accuracy, Mahalanobis distance prediction risk was also considered in the construction of combinational weight selection criteria. And by constructing the Wishart distribution, the unbiased estimate of predicted loss was derived as the selection criterion of weight. Compared with the original MMMA criterion, the resulting MMMAc added a bias correction term, which reduced the bias in the prediction loss estimation. Therefore, the weight estimation obtained by minimizing this criterion was closer to the theoretical optimal combination weight that is not available. Finally, the simulation and comparison experiments verified the advantages of the MMMAc method: the MMMAc estimation has the same asymptotic optimality as the MMMA estimation, so there is no significant difference in their performance in the large sample case; however, since the modified weight selection criterion is an unbiased estimate of the prediction loss, the MMMAc method performs better in the case of insufficient sample size.
Key words:  multivariate response linear regression  model averaging methods  Mallows criterion  Wishart distributio
重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版) 版权所有
地址:中国 重庆市 南岸区学府大道19号 重庆工商大学学术期刊社 邮编:400067
电话:023-62769495 传真:
您是第4752857位访客
关注微信二维码