数字鸿沟对家庭消费相对剥夺的加剧效应研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Aggravating Effect of Digital Divide on Relative Deprivation of Household Consumption
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    数字经济发展促进了家庭消费增长,但数字鸿沟的存在使不同家庭享有不同的数字红利,从而产生新的消费不平等,导致数字化水平较低家庭的消费相对剥夺程度增加。采用2015、2017、2019年中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据的分析发现:数字鸿沟的扩大会增强家庭消费相对剥夺程度,该影响在各年度均显著存在,且对发展享乐型消费相对剥夺的强化作用比对基础生存型消费相对剥夺的强化作用更大;家庭的社会网络和创业行为具有中介作用,即数字鸿沟扩大可以通过削弱家庭社会网络和抑制家庭创业来加剧家庭消费相对剥夺;数字鸿沟扩大对不同类型家庭均具有显著的消费相对剥夺加剧效应,但在影响强度上具有异质性,表现为对使用移动支付家庭、农村家庭、抚养比较低家庭、男性户主家庭的影响更大。因此,一方面应积极缩小数字鸿沟,加快数字经济发展滞后地区的数字基础设施建设,加强对数字弱势群体的数字技能和数字消费意识培育;另一方面,应针对数字鸿沟加剧消费不平等的机制采取相应措施,有效促进弱势家庭的社会网络改善和创业发展。

    Abstract:

    While digital technology has brought convenience to residents’ lives, it has also created a prominent problem of digital inequality. Despite China’s significant progress in establishing the world’s largest, technologically advanced, and superior digital infrastructure since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party, the digital divide among households has not diminished. The widening digital divide has suppressed household consumption and intensified consumption inequality. Simply improving the universality of digital public services is not enough to alleviate the digital divide between families’ digital literacy. Therefore, how to effectively bridge the family digital divide and identify the key objects and pathways of digital literacy promotion plans are practical problems that need to be solved to promote the high-quality development of the digital economy. Based on the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) in 2015, 2017, and 2019, this paper measures the digital divide and its impact on relative deprivation in household consumption from three aspects of digital technology or tool use. It is found that the digital divide is not conducive to the promotion of household consumption, resulting in relative consumption deprivation, and the conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. Specifically, the impact of the digital divide on basic subsistence consumption weakens while its inhibitory effect on luxury consumption strengthens. The relative degree of consumption deprivation is greater in households with low dependence on male heads of household, mobile payment, rural areas, and low dependency ratio. Mechanism analysis shows that the digital divide intensifies household consumption inequality mainly by weakening family social networks and reducing the probability of starting a family business. Compared with the existing researches, the main expansions and innovations of this paper are as follows: (1) focusing on the digital divide between family digital skills, analyzing the dynamic evolution and impact of the digital divide from the micro level, and revealing the main focus points of national digital economy development and digital public service inclusive work; (2) focusing on the typical structural characteristics of Chinese families, such as “men in charge of the outside, women in charge of the inside” and “old people and young people at home”, exploring the heterogeneity of the digital divide and answering which families are more likely to be deprived of consumption; (3) in line with the theoretical connotation of the relative balance of common prosperity, the measurement of digital and consumption inequality adopts the relative concept and accordingly chooses social network and entrepreneurial behavior as the intermediate mechanism, so as to explore the effective mechanisms to bridge the family digital divide. This paper identifies the effects and pathways of the digital divide from the micro-household level, and reveals that the key targets of the digital literacy promotion plan are male household heads, families with low dependence on mobile payment, rural households, and households with a low dependency ratio. The key to bridging the digital divide is to jointly improve the family digital literacy and the inclusive level of regional digital infrastructure. Relying on digital platforms to expand social networks and optimize the investment and entrepreneurial environment is an effective way. This paper provides a useful reference for promoting the inclusive sharing of digital dividends and high-quality development.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王彦芳,王恺涛,陈则霖,姚景民.数字鸿沟对家庭消费相对剥夺的加剧效应研究[J].西部论坛,2023,33(5):36-51

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-11