行政区划调整赋能民营企业创新发展的机制研究——基于“撤县设区”的经验分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Study on the Mechanism of Administrative District Adjustment to Empower Private Enterprises' Innovation and Development: an Empirical Analysis Based on the “Removing Counties and Establishing Districts”
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    行政壁垒导致的市场分割是制约民营企业创新发展的主要因素之一,行政区划调整须促进地区间的市场一体化才能有效赋能民营企业创新发展。“撤县设区”弱化了被撤并县域与市辖区之间的行政壁垒和市场分割,可以促进被撤并县域民营企业的人力资本水平提升和外部融资增加,并通过产业集聚的竞争加剧效应和创新成本降低效应激励民营企业的技术创新行为,进而促进民营企业创新发展。采用2011—2020年沪深A股民营上市公司数据的分析发现:“撤县设区”显著促进了被撤并县域民营企业研发强度和专利授权数的增长,其中存在“撤县设区—提升企业人力资本—创新投入和产出增加”“撤县设区—缓解企业融资约束—创新投入和产出增加”“撤县设区—促进地区产业集聚—创新投入和产出增加”3条影响路径;“撤县设区”的民营企业创新促进效应主要体现在外部融资依赖程度较高的企业和东部地区的企业中,“撤县设区”促进了二三产业的民营企业创新,但对第一产业的民营企业创新具有负向影响;“撤县设区”并未对周边未撤并县域产生显著的“虹吸效应”。因此,行政区划调整应将构建统一大市场作为重点工作,营造更为开放公平共享的市场环境,并减少地方政府对市场的过度干预。

    Abstract:

    As a typical policy for the adjustment of administrative districts at the county level, the development dividend released by “removing counties and establishing districts” has become increasingly prominent. However, in the research on the policy effect of “removing counties and establishing districts”, the existing literature rarely discusses its influence on the innovation of private enterprises, especially the lack of empirical evidence. This paper holds that the market segmentation caused by administrative barriers is one of the main factors restricting the innovation and development of private enterprises, and the adjustment of administrative districts must promote the market integration between regions in order to effectively empower the innovation and development of private enterprises. The administrative barriers and market segmentation between the annexed counties and the municipal districts are weakened by “removing counties and establishing districts”, which can enhance the technological innovation capability of private enterprises in the annexed counties through promoting the improvement of human capital and increasing external financing. The innovation willingness of private enterprises in the removed counties can be enhanced through the competitive intensification effect of industrial agglomeration and the innovation cost reduction effect, which in turn promotes the innovation development of private enterprises. Based on the quasi-natural experiment of “removing counties and establishing districts”, this paper uses the data of private listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2011 to 2020 to carry out multi-stage double differential test. The results show that “removing counties and establishing districts” has significantly promoted the increase of R&D intensity and patent authorization number of private enterprises in the removed counties, among which the level of human capital, external financing and regional industrial agglomeration have played a part in the intermediary effect. That is to say, there are three influencing paths, namely, “removing counties and establishing districts—enhancing human capital of enterprises—increasing input and output of technological innovation”, “removing counties and establishing districts—easing the financing constraints of enterprises—increasing input and output of technological innovation”, “removing counties and establishing districts—promoting regional industrial agglomeration—increasing input and output of technological innovation”. The innovation promotion effect of “removing counties and establishing districts” is mainly reflected in enterprises with high dependence on external financing and enterprises in the eastern region. “Removing counties and establishing districts” promotes the innovation of private enterprises in the secondary and tertiary industries, but has a negative impact on the innovation of private enterprises in the primary industry. While promoting industrial agglomeration and innovation of private enterprises in the merged counties, “removing counties and establishing districts ” has not produced significant “siphon effect” on the surrounding counties that have not been merged. Compared with the existing literature, this paper discusses the influence and mechanism of “removing counties and establishing districts” on the innovation behavior of private enterprises, which not only expands and deepens the research on the micro-economic effect of administrative division adjustment, but also provides empirical evidence and policy enlightenment for further effectively promoting the innovation and development of private enterprises. This paper shows that the administrative district adjustment represented by “removing counties and establishing districts” effectively promotes the innovation development of private enterprises by promoting regional market integration. Therefore, in the process of actively promoting the adjustment of administrative districts, we should focus on building a unified big market. On one hand, we should create a more open, fair, and shared market environment; on the other hand, we should reduce excessive intervention in the market and realize the deep coupling between “promising government” and “effective market”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐光伟,孙露,刘星.行政区划调整赋能民营企业创新发展的机制研究——基于“撤县设区”的经验分析[J].西部论坛,2023,33(1):108-124

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-23