不同预期冲击的叠加效应与预期管理优化——以货币政策预期和技术进步预期为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Superposition Effect of Different Expected Shocks and the Optimization of Expectation Management: Taking the Monetary Policy Expectation and Technological Progress Expectation as Examples
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    “预期转弱”是当前中国经济高质量发展面临的难点之一,需要通过优化预期管理来提振预期。现实经济中存在不同类型的多样化预期,然而现有研究大多研究单个预期(特别是货币政策预期)冲击的宏观经济效应,对不同预期的叠加效应缺乏系统深入的探讨。本文将预期分为政策预期(基于政府制定、调整及实施宏观经济政策产生的预期)和非政策预期(基于社会经济发展实态等形成的预期),并认为:当政策预期与非政策预期相契合时,两种预期冲击叠加会对政策有效性产生“累进(退)”效应;当政策预期与非政策预期错位时,两种预期冲击叠加对政策有效性会产生“抵消”效应。比如,宽松货币政策的实施及相应的预期管理操作会使经济主体产生未来经济向好的预期,并激励其采取积极的投资和消费行为,进而提高货币政策的有效性;现实经济中良好的技术进步态势会使经济主体形成未来经济繁荣的预期,并促使采取积极的创新、投资、消费行为,最终表现为货币政策有效性提高;两种正向预期的叠加则会进一步增强宽松货币政策的有效性。采用货币政策调控指数和全要素生产率来描述货币政策和技术进步预期冲击,运用DSGE模型和SV-TVP-FAVAR模型对“无预期冲击”“存在货币政策预期冲击”“存在技术进步预期冲击”“存在货币政策和技术进步双重预期冲击”4种情形下的货币政策有效性进行模拟分析和实证检验,结果显示,两种预期冲击均增强了货币政策有效性,并在总体上形成叠加“累进”效应。与现有文献相比,本文进行了如下改进和拓展:一是基于政策预期与非政策预期的角度探究货币政策和技术进步预期冲击的叠加效应,二是采用货币政策调控指数回避以往研究中量价工具“非此即彼”的选择问题,三是运用SV-TVP-FAVAR模型为货币政策和技术进步预期冲击的宏观经济效应提供经验证据。本文研究表明,预期管理是一项系统性工程,需要构建和完善宏观调控预期管理体系。要正确认识政策预期与非政策预期的契合与错位,利用政策预期增强(弱化)积极(消极)的非政策预期,并优化各种预期管理之间的方式匹配和期限组合;政策预期管理的优化要提高各种政策调整之间的协同性,并完善政策信息传导机制;非政策预期管理的优化则要完善宏观经济信息传导机制,并改善市场环境。货币政策预期管理的改进,需要提高政策调整及工具使用的合理性和适宜性,并不断完善央行沟通、前瞻指引等预期管理方式,实现政策信息传导的及时有效。

    Abstract:

    “Weakening expectations” is one of the difficulties in China’s high-quality economic development. It is necessary to improve expectations by optimizing the management of expectations. There are different types of expectations in the real economy. However, most of the existing research studies the macroeconomic effects of a single expectation (especially monetary policy expectation) shocks, and lacks a systematic and in-depth discussion on the superposition effect of different expectations. In this paper, expectations are divided into policy expectations (based on the government’s formulation, adjustment and implementation of macroeconomic policies) and non-policy expectations (based on the reality of social and economic development). It is believed that when policy expectations and non-policy expectations are consistent, the superposition of the two expected shocks will have a “progressive (regressive)” effect on policy effectiveness; when policy expectations and non-policy expectations are misaligned, the superposition of the two expected shocks will have an “offsetting” effect on policy effectiveness. For example, the implementation of the loose monetary policy and the corresponding expectation management will make the economic entities have good expectations for the future economy, and encourage them to take active investment and consumption behaviors, thereby improving the effectiveness of monetary policy; good technological progress in the real economy will make the economic subject form the expectation of future economic prosperity, and promote the adoption of positive innovation, investment, and consumption behavior, which will ultimately be manifested in the improvement of the effectiveness of monetary policy; the superposition of the two positive expectations will further enhance the effectiveness of the loose monetary policy. The monetary policy adjustment index and total factor productivity are used to describe the expected shock of monetary policy and technological progress, and the DSGE model and the SV-TVP-FAVAR model are used to conduct simulation analysis and empirical test on the effectiveness of monetary policy under four scenarios, namely, “no expected shock”, “expected shock of monetary policy”, “expected shock of technological progress” and “dual expected shocks of monetary policy and technological progress”. The results show that both expected shocks enhance the effectiveness of monetary policy and form a superimposed “progressive” effect on the whole. Compared with the existing literature, this paper has made the following improvements and extensions. Firstly, based on policy expectations and non-policy expectations, this paper explores the superposition effect of monetary policy and expected shocks of technological progress. Secondly, this paper uses the monetary policy regulation index and avoids the “either/or” choice of quantitative and priced instruments in previous studies. Thirdly, the SV-TVP-FAVAR model is applied to provide empirical evidence on the macroeconomic effects of expected shocks to monetary policy and technological progress. The research in this paper shows that expectation management is a systematic project, and it is necessary to construct and improve the macro-control expectation management system. It is necessary to correctly understand the coincidence and dislocation between policy expectations and non-policy expectations, use policy expectations to strengthen (weaken) positive (negative) non-policy expectations, and optimize the way matching and term combination between various expectations management; the optimization of policy expectation management should improve the synergy between various policy adjustments and improve the policy information transmission mechanism; to optimize the management of non-policy expectations, it is necessary to improve the macroeconomic information transmission mechanism and improve the market environment. Moreover, to improve the management of monetary policy expectations, it is necessary to improve the rationality and appropriateness of policy adjustment and the use of tools, and to continuously improve the central bank’s communication, forward-looking guidance and other expectations management methods to achieve timely and effective policy information transmission.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张龙,申瑛琦,尹韦琪.不同预期冲击的叠加效应与预期管理优化——以货币政策预期和技术进步预期为例[J].西部论坛,2022,32(4):11-25

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-10-13