中国农村土地制度的第二次飞跃——基于马克思主义政治经济学的解读
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Second Leap Forward of China’s Rural Land System: Interpretation Based on Marxism Political Economics
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    中国社会主义农业的发展,已实现了从人民公社制度到家庭联产承包制的“第一次飞跃”,但仍需要向规模化经营和集体经济方向进行“第二次飞跃”。本文基于马克思主义唯物史观,考察了社会经济形态演进的两条路径,提出生产关系适应生产力发展是中国社会主义农业第一次飞跃的理论依据,这表现为社会经济形态演进的第一条路径。而生产关系改革引领生产方式演进和生产力水平跃升,则是中国社会主义农业第二次飞跃的理论依据,这表现为社会经济形态演进的第二条路径。在对安徽小岗和贵州塘约进行实地调研的基础上,本文提出:我国农村土地制度和经营体制的改革可以明确土地股份合作制的发展方向,着力改变目前农地集体所有权的“空置”状况,恢复和增强集体土地所有权的收益功能。在此基础上,分类设计农地制度的三类具体形式,一是引导农业专业合作社发展的大中型农地股份合作社,二是引导种田大户和家庭联合农场发展的中小型农地股份合作社,三是引导“农户+公司”模式发展的农地股份公司。

    Abstract:

    The development of Chinese socialist agriculture has realized the first leap forward from People’s Commune system to family contracted land system, but still needs the second leap forward from family production to scale production and collective economy. Based on Marxism materialism philosophy, this paper examines the two paths of social economic pattern evolution, and proposes that production relation fitting for the development of productivity is the theoretical basis for the first leap forward of China’s socialist agriculture, which embodies the first path for socialist economic pattern evolution. However, the theoretical basis for the second leap forward of China’s socialist agriculture is to use production relation reform to lead production method evolution and productivity level rise, which embodies the second path of social economic pattern evolution. Based on spot survey on Xiaogang Village of Anhui Province and Tangyue Village of Guizhou Province, this paper advances that the reform of China’s rural land system and management system can clarify the development direction of land share cooperation system by changing the “empty” status of rural land collective ownership and by restoring and enhancing the gain function of collective land ownership. On the basis of that, three kinds of concrete forms of rural land system are separately designed, one is to lead agricultural specific cooperative to develop big and medium-sized rural land share cooperative, the second is to guide big planting farmers and family alliance farmland to develop medium-sized and small rural land share cooperative, and the third is to guide “farmer family + company” mode to develop rural land share company.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

课题组.中国农村土地制度的第二次飞跃——基于马克思主义政治经济学的解读[J].西部论坛,2018,28(4):4-11

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-19