财政视角下洋务运动与明治维新的比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparative Study on Westernization Movement andMeiji Reform from the View of Public Finance
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    洋务运动前的中国和明治维新前的日本财政状况相似,都遇到了财政危机。由于两国在变革前政治、经济的差异以及两国改革指导思想和领导力量的不同,清政府的洋务运动并未进行政治体制的改革,财政体制也仍然是封建制度下的管理方式,只是把中央政府的财权下移,最终没有带来财政状况的改善,反而加剧了财政危机;而日本政府的明治维新改革是全方位的,进行了相对彻底的政治体制改革,改革俸禄制度以减少财政支出,改革地税以增加财政收入,扶持民间资本以开拓新税源,最终化解了财政危机,并建立了新的有利于资本主义生产方式发展的财政体制。

    Abstract:

    The financial situation in China before Westernization Movement and the financial situation in Japan before Meiji Reform were similar and confronted financial crisis. Because of political and economic difference before the reform of the two countries, and because of the difference in reform guiding ideas and leading capacity of the two countries, Westernization Movement of the Qing Dynasty did not conduct political system reform, its financial system was still the management style under feudal system, the Qing Dynasty only decentralized its financial right, which finally did not bring about financial situation change but intensified financial crisis, however, Meiji Reform of Japanese Government is overall, conducted relatively thorough political system reform, reformed salary system to reduce financial expenditure, reformed land tax to increase financial revenue, supported civil capital to exploit new tax sources and finally solved financial crisis to have set up new financial system conducive to capitalist production mode development.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘济勇,张 楠.财政视角下洋务运动与明治维新的比较研究[J].西部论坛,2013,23(2):95-101

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: