论基层政府权威缺失与农村群体性事件——基于巴纳德“权威接受论”的原因分析及对乡村治理的启示
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Research on lack of authority of low-level governments and rural mass disturbances——Revelation of Barnard s acceptance theory of authority on countryside governance
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    当前,因基层政府行为失范、农村中的“大宗族,小政府”现象以及“能人”权威的替代等造成的基层政府权威缺失,是农村群体性事件中基层政府对社会管理的失控的主要原因之一。根据巴纳德的“权威接受论”,权威是否存在,不是来源于上级,而是来源于下级的认可;在乡村治理中,治理的权威不是来自于上级政府对基层政府的授予,而是来源于基层民众的认可。因此,基层政府在乡村治理中权威地位的树立,应基于民众的认可,必须实实在在为民众办实事。

    Abstract:

    Currently, the loss of low - level governmants’authority, which sources from the low - level governments’abnormal actions because of their being controlled by the local big gens and able person, is one of the reasons that make the countryside social management out of the control of the low - level rural governments in ruralmass disturbances. According to the Barnard’s accep tance theory, the authority is from accep tance of the low - level peop le, not higher authorities. In the countryside governance, the authority is alike from the low - level peop le accep tance, but not from granting by the higher governments. And so the low - level governments should do services for local peop le if they want to regain their authority in the countryside governance

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周志荣;谢锐勤.论基层政府权威缺失与农村群体性事件——基于巴纳德“权威接受论”的原因分析及对乡村治理的启示[J].西部论坛,2008,(3):89-93

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: