两种企业经济效益综合评价方法比较——以大中型工业企业为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparison of two comprehensive evaluation methods of enterprise economic benefit——Taking big and medium-sized enterprises as an example
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    对经济效益进行评价有多种方法,单项指标只能从一个侧面或一个角度反映宏观经济效益的状况,而根据不同的生产环节、不同角度的指标来评价的企业经济效益,有时会得到不完全一致的结论.常规的综合评价方法和多元统计方法是实用性较强的两种综合评价方法,但是也都有各自的局限性,因此在使用时要权衡每一种方法的优劣,以对宏观经济效益有全面客观的评价.

    Abstract:

    There are many methods to evaluate economic benefit, single index can only reflex macro-economic status from one side or one angle, however, according to different production steps, sometimes, different conclusions can be drawn by using the indexes from different angles to evaluate the economic benefit of an enterprise. General comprehensive evaluation method and multivariate statistics method are the two comprehensive evaluation methods with strong practicability but have its own limitation, as a result, the advantages and disadvantages of each method should be measured when they are used so as to overall make objective evaluation on macro-economic benefit.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邢莉,袁志强.两种企业经济效益综合评价方法比较——以大中型工业企业为例[J].西部论坛,2007,(4):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: