引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1332次   下载 2766 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
我国垄断行业与竞争行业高管薪酬激励效应比较——以煤、电、纺织、服装业为例
李世尧1
浙江省电力建设有限公司,浙江 宁波
摘要:
根据沪、深股市2006—2011年电力、煤炭、纺织业、服装业上市公司的数据,运用面板估计方法比较我国垄断行业与竞争行业高管薪酬激励效应的差异,结果表明:垄断行业上市公司的高管薪酬与公司业绩不相关,而竞争行业高管薪酬与公司业绩正相关;垄断行业的公司业绩与高管持股比例无显著相关性,而竞争行业高管持股比例与公司业绩正相关。因此,垄断行业国有企业高层管理者的政治激励高于薪酬激励,企业运行市场化程度依然不高,还需进一步加快国有企业体制改革的步伐。此外,研究也证明通过股权制衡可以抑制控股股东的“侵占”行为和大股东之间的“内耗”,从而提高公司的治理效率和业绩。
关键词:  垄断行业  竞争行业  国有企业  高管薪酬  薪酬激励  公司业绩  高管持股比例  高管收益分成比例  股权制衡
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Comparison of CEO Compensation Incentive Effect between Monopoly Industries and Competitive Industries of China —Taking Coal,Electricity,Textile an Garment Industry as an Example
LI Shi-yao
Abstract:
According to the data of listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen of electric power, coal, textile and garment industry during 2006 2011, the difference of CEO compensation incentive effects between monopoly industries and competitive industries of China is compared by panel estimation method, and the results show that the CEO compensation in monopoly industries in listed companies is not related to their company performance, however, the CEO compensation in competitive industries in listed companies is positively related to their company performance, that the company performance of monopoly industries is not significantly related to the ratio of the CEO shareholding, however, the ratio of the CEO shareholding in competitive industries is positively related to their company performance. Thus, the political incentive for the CEOs in state-owned enterprises of monopoly industries is higher than compensation incentive, the marketization degree of the enterprises operation is still not sufficient, and the step for state owned enterprise system reform should be further accelerated. Besides, the research also shows that the“embezzlement”of shareholders and“internal struggle”between shareholders of the enterprises can be reduced by equity control so that the management efficiency and performance of the companies can be raised.
Key words:  monopoly industries  competitive industries  state-owned enterprise  CEO compensation  compensation incentive  company performance  ratio of CEO shareholding  income distribution ratio of CEO  equity control
《西部论坛》编辑部 版权所有
地址:中国 重庆市 南岸区学府大道19号,重庆工商大学学术期刊社 邮编:400067
电话:023-62769479 传真:
您是第3169187位访客
关注微信二维码
西部论坛 在线投稿 (原《重庆工商大学学报·西部论坛》)
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览次   下载  
分享到: 微信 更多
摘要:
关键词:  
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Abstract:
Key words:  
《西部论坛》编辑部 版权所有
地址:中国 重庆市 南岸区学府大道19号,重庆工商大学学术期刊社 邮编:400067
电话:023-62769479 传真:
您是第3174873位访客
关注微信二维码